Blackberry Messenger, Google Maps, YouTube and other less conventional information hubs were put under scrutiny on the 21 January at the Frontline Club. Richard Pendry, a journalist and lecturer at the University of Kent, chaired the fully booked discussion titled: The Changing Face of News Gathering.

Well-versed in the art of unconventional news gathering and distribution, were a panel of speakers including; Eliot Higgins author of the Brown Moses Blog; Malachy Browne, news editor of Storyful; and Trushar Barot assistant editor at the social media and User Generated Content (UGT) at BBC News. The fourth panellist, whose true identity remained hidden, was the charity Videre’s head of operations who was referred to as Greg.

The categorisation of news gathering as traditional or non-traditional was flagged as problematic from the start. When asked if he considered himself a non-traditional reporter, Browne said:

“The source of information that we receive a few years ago would have been considered non-traditional, its primarily social media content that we work with… Its the application of traditional news values and journalism values to a new form of information.”

Browne continued,

“Storyful was founded on the idea that you can draw news from the noise… We filter the social web in a way so that we are able to monitor it very effectively.”

It was made clear that individuals are becoming citizen journalists by generating valuable content and presenting it to the public. Higgins is a good example of this, he became a well known journalist by gathering information on the weapons being used in Syria. Through online channels he effectively accessed and deciphered information which confirmed an arms smuggling route from Croatia through Jordan to the opposition fighters.

Barot gave us some perspective from within the BBC on the advancements of social media:

“Its changed a lot. Four years ago just finding a reporter who would take Twitter seriously as a journalistic tool was not easy… Now we have hundreds of reporters on Twitter.”

He went on to mark the 2011 UK riots as a point when Twitter really came into its own in conveying news as it happened. Barot said:

“As well as being a source of pictures, videos and eye-witness accounts we were feeding in real-time intelligence in terms of our news desks.”

Unlike some of the others’ approach, Greg’s organisation Videre, whose motto is “Seeing is Believing”, goes back to first-hand evidence collecting for various media and human rights organisations. Run like a secret intelligence core, Videre’s reporter’s identities’, as well as the information they collect, remain untraceable and their carefully gathered  information is given away for free. Pendry outlined a potential concern:

“How does anyone know if any of this stuff is true? There is no transparency at all so it completely depends on everyone trusting you and the people that work with you.”

When asked why Videre does what it does, Greg answered simply, “To try to do good.”

It was made clear that the credibility of information and how to verify it is an issue which plagues new media sources. Higgins demonstrated how he pieced together information from anonymous Libyan footage to effectively map events. The already media savvy audience were eager to hear more tips on geo-location technology which Browne went on to outline.  He emphasises the importance of investigating three questions; the source, date and location.

Browne went on to provide an example as to how his team of experts confirmed recent footage coming out of Dariya, Syria as well as how they traced the author of a video posted during the Boston Marathon bombing.

With the boundaries of investigative journalism being pushed in this way, the question of privacy became essential. Barot highlighted:

“Something these social media companies are pushing towards is that actually there is nothing wrong in being open and that privacy is a bit of an illusion.”

Evidently in Videre’s case privacy must be upheld at all costs and Greg summarised the high-tech low-tech balance well, he said:

“To understand when to use the the technology which enables you and when using it puts you and other people in danger.”

While exploring the open media platforms available to journalists is essential in todays world, Barot warned of the growing number of closed social media tools such as chat applications. While Barot could not predict what future technology in the media world would look like, he confirmed a far wider spread of mobile technology. He concluded:

“That is one of the things that is definitely going to be a big change over the next 18 months as mobile technology becomes so much more ubiquitous in the developing world.”

Watch or listen to the event here:

https://soundcloud.com/frontlineclub/the-changing-face-of-news

In more and more places around the world it is becoming increasingly difficult and dangerous for foreign journalists to gain access and cover stories as they unfold. In the past, this often meant that events would remain unreported. This is no longer the case. User generated content (UGC) – and the innovative ways in which it is used – is creating a new way of seeing the story on the ground.

We will be joined by a panel working on the edges of the news to get the stories where conventional means have failed. They will be talking about the technology and the techniques that they use, looking at how content is verified, and how you can empower people to tell their own stories and distribute it to local and international communities.

Chaired by Richard Pendry, a lecturer in broadcast journalism at the University of Kent, where he is currently researching non-traditional news gatherers working in areas of conflict.

The panel:

Eliot Higgins is author of the Brown Moses Blog, which specialises in analysing social media produced from the conflict in Syria. His work has included uncovering smuggled Croatian arms in Syria, and in depth investigations into the August 21 sarin attack in Damascus. Twitter: @Brown_Moses

Malachy Browne is news editor with Storyful. Prior to that he created and edited Politico.ie, an Irish political website and news archive. He worked for the Irish political magazine, Village from 2006 to 2008 and was editor of the magazine’s website, Village.ie. Twitter: @malachybrowne

Videre’s head of operations, an international charity founded in 2008. They work in partnership with local activists in hard-to-access areas giving them equipment, training and support to gather visual evidence of human rights violations and other abuses. This captured footage is verified, analysed and then distributed. Twitter: @_videre

Trushar Barot is assistant editor at the Social Media and User Generated Content hub at BBC News. He has worked in the British media for the past 15 years, across newspapers, TV, radio, online, social and digital. Over the past four years he has helped develop and implement BBC News’ social media strategy, as well as helping to maintain the UGC hub’s work as an industry-leading team in social media news gathering. Twitter: @Trushar

Photograph: 1000 Words / Shutterstock.com

MySpace and its ambitious rival, Facebook.com are the leaders among social networking websites. Wikipedia tells us that social networks are where interactive users submit their personal profiles, write blogs, create groups and upload and download music, photos, and video.

But if MySpace and the video phenomenon YouTube are mostly about swapping and sharing things trivial, amusing, or hilarious, they’re also a force in politics and a must stop for American presidential candidates. MySpace has just created its “Impact” channel with unfiltered information about all the hopefuls- frontrunners, dark horses, and no-hopers- they’re all there.

For video coverage, the place to go is YouTube’s “YouChoose 08” where an unguarded comment captured on a mobile phone and spotted by a blogger or political action group can destroy a political campaign. John McCain’s “That old Beach Boys song ‘Bomb Iran’. Bomb, bomb, bomb…” quip has been seen more than a million times and has put him and his campaign on the defensive.

So how does all this relate to the Frontline Club. Some of you are already aware that the latest Vaughan Smith brainchild is the Frontline Club Network – our own online network for connecting members whether they’re on assignment, freelancing, or working on media projects. As best we can determine this is the first dedicated online journalism professional and social network.

The Frontline Club Network is at what one of its architects, new media journalist Ben Hammersley, calls alpha testing stage. But those of you already signed up or about to will see its potential. There are all the obvious features of the other social network site-networking, blogging, creating groups built around specific interests and organisations and posting video and photos. Those post-Frontline event discussions can now live beyond the Club bar and engage anyone who saw the debate or watched the video online. Yet the network has greater aspirations related to the overall philosophy of the Frontline Club in championing independent journalism and both showcasing and publishing the work of freelances and independent journalists.

But will the Frontline Club Network, I asked Ben Hammersley, run the risk of debasing, not enhancing journalism standards? After all, how much User Generated Content (UGC) exists out there -material not gathered, processed, and published according to any shared journalistic values? That’s where the Frontline Club can make a difference according to Hammersley and “will hopefully provide a higher quality of content than is usually found on the Internet. It’s less about UGC than about helping traditional journalists transition to a digital marketplace as individuals.”