Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/dh_ueu9qi/beta.frontlineclub.com/wp-content/themes/frontline3.6/functions.php:1) in /home/dh_ueu9qi/beta.frontlineclub.com/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
Non-violent protest – Frontline Club http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com Championing Independent Journalism Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:25:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 1971: The year they took the truth http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/1971-the-year-they-took-the-truth/ http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/1971-the-year-they-took-the-truth/#respond Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:19:24 +0000 http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/?p=45789 By George Symonds

“J. Edgar Hoover was apoplectic.”

On Monday 29 September 2014, the Frontline Club screened 1971, the incredible story of eight US citizens whose courage – both moral and physical – led them to break into an FBI office to confiscate evidence of the bureau’s grave abuses of power.

The self-incriminating documents revealed the existence of COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program), the remit of which ranged from spying on women’s tea parties to what Noam Chomsky described as the, “Gestapo-style assassination”of Black Panther leaders.

In the post-screeening Q&A we were joined by director Johanna Hamilton via video link.


“It’s the FBI!” exclaimed a member of the audience, when the video programme experienced a slight delay in connection.

Hamilton began by outlining the two main challenges she faced in documenting a story hidden for 40 years:

“One, that they had never been found. They never revealed themselves. They were talking to Betty Medsger, The Washington Post journalist, she was writing a book and that is how I gained access to the story.

“The other real substantive thing is was that because they had never come out, we weren’t sure how the government would react. It was one of the largest FBI investigations that the bureau had ever undertaken. That’s a very little know fact, obviously because it was such a public embarrassment. . . . This was really a we did it as opposed to a whodunit.”

Hamilton then quoted the FBI’s response to reporters covering the film:

“We’re a different institution today than we were in the 70s. We’re reformed. We’ve reformed ourselves partially as a result of the revelations that happened in the 70s.”

“They didn’t reference the burglary directly,” noted Hamilton, “but obviously that was a great relief that the Citizens’ Commission was not going to go to jail.

“President Obama has become known for prosecuting whistleblowers,” she continued, “and obviously the film was coming out in the wake of the Edward Snowden revelations so there was a lot of hoopla surrounding that.”

Director Johanna Hamilton

“I really did want to be able to tell the full personal story and the political aftermath of the story,” said Hamilton, on her decision to use recreations:

“I wanted it to be cinematic, and for people to really be able to put themselves in their shoes. And they’re very unconventional whistleblowers. They’re very non-traditional, they’re not insiders. They were outsiders, so they do have to do this quite extraordinary thing. It was really improbable that they would pull it off, number one, and that they would find what they were looking for, and that they would remain undetected all that time.”

A member of the audience commented that he had left the states as a student in 1967: “What I found in your film, that very few people who are not of my generation may not feel so much, is how innocent we all are. . . . The brutishness of it is still active today. I see Laura Poitras is in your production credits. She’s got an indictment against her . . . and I think the situation has got much worse.”

IMG_7955

Future screenings and workshops can be found on the film’s official website and Twitter account.

]]>
http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/1971-the-year-they-took-the-truth/feed/ 0
Screening: Winter, Go Away + Q&A http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/winter-go-away/ Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:56:09 +0000 http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/?p=24881 Anton Seregin via Skype. ]]> Followed by a Q&A with director Anton Seregin via Skype.

While the streets of Moscow are in winter’s cold grip, its living rooms, offices and polling stations are ablaze with debate. Ten graduates of Marina Razbezhkina and Mikhail Ugarov’s Documentary Filmmaking and Theater School are commissioned by Novaya Gazeta, an independent Russian newspaper, to capture the scene.

Loaded with conflict and turbulent emotions, this street-level account of last winter’s demonstrations against Vladimir Putin’s presidential run, chronicles the political process and those dissatisfied with it. Capturing the conversations, rallies, victories and the brutality of the crackdowns, the film explores the interconnection of the church and politics, as well as the division of the nation into patriots and traitors.

Winter Go Away

Directed by Alexey Zhiryakov, Anna Moiseenko, Anton Seregin, Askold Kurov, Denis Klebleev, Dmitry Kubasov, Elena Khoreva, Madina Mustafina, Nadezhda Leonteva and Sofia Rodkevich
Duration: 79′
Year: 2012

]]>
5 Broken Cameras: Screening and Directors’ Q&A http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/5_broken_cameras_screening_and_directors_qa_1/ http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/5_broken_cameras_screening_and_directors_qa_1/#respond Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:43:58 +0000 http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/dev/5_broken_cameras_screening_and_directors_qa_1/ By Jim Treadway 

"So many films have been made about the Israel-Palestine conflict", Israeli flimmaker Guy Davidi remarked to an audience at the Frontline Club on Friday night. But the documentary 5 Broken Cameras he made with Palestinian farmer Emad Burnat was "much more important than just another objective film about the movement," he said.  It was a personal, emotional story "that everybody can connect to."
 
5 Broken Cameras relies on Burnat’s footage to chronicle his family’s and friends’ experiences waging non-violent protest against encroaching Israeli settlements into their West Bank village of Bil’in.
 
"I never thought of making films," Burnat narrates as the film begins. But in 2005, when his fourth son Gibreel was born, Burnat bought his first camera, "to rediscover the world through his [Gibreel’s] eyes."    
 
As Gibreel grows up, he sees his father, uncles, and their friends arrested, imprisoned, and killed by Israeli soldiers.  He plays with his brothers in fields where the concrete skeletons of new settlements loom in the distance. Burnat worries about how Israeli injustice has affected his sons.
 
"I am tired of just dealing with identity issues," Davidi reflected after the screening.  "I’m just interested in the politics on the ground."  He hoped his film had found:
"a new path, a new emotional path […] even for much of the so-called left wing in Israel, they’ve never experienced this.  They’ve never experienced this emotional journey."
Both Davidi and Burnat focused on healing.  Of Jews’ and Palestinians’ traumatic pasts, Davidi said during the Q&A:  
"If you’re a victim, you have a responsibility to heal yourself, to find a way out."
Burnat’s narration echoed him:  
"Healing is a challenge in life.  It’s the victim’s sole obligation […] forgotten wounds can’t be healed, so I film […] it helps me confront life, and begin to heal."
]]>
http://www.beta.frontlineclub.com/5_broken_cameras_screening_and_directors_qa_1/feed/ 0