“I saw them,” he said.

His wife rolled over. “Uumph,” she replied.

“They were all around me,” said Alex. “Eyes like wild animals.”

“Not again,” she mumbled.

“I was tied up by the fire. They wore antlers, boots, and feathers. They had drums and rattles, and a dog, an iguana, and a big black bird.”

“Nearer and nearer they came,” said his wife into her pillow.

“I could feel their breath,” squeaked Alex.

“They began to chant,” his wife continued.

“NO DNA! NO DNA! NO DNA!” screamed Alex, and dove beneath the covers.

His wife sat up and rubbed her eyes. “You’re too old to believe in that kind of thing, Alex. I’ll get you a nice warm bottle of milk.”

“No DNA,” whispered Alex.

“I’ll read you ‘Uncle Wiggly.’ ”

He whimpered, lay his head on her breast, and fell into a fitful sleep.

At 14:50 a woman says that the torn condom Gibney presents as evidence of Assange’s ‘trying to get women pregnant’ was found to have NO DNA on it. “How can you possibly justify not putting that fact in?” she asks.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/no-assange-dna-on-torn-condom–report-20120916-260vs.html

See how Gibney reacts physically (15:21), and then verbally. “There were a lot of facts that weren’t put in about the case…”

At 17:18 Gibney accuses Assange of “vilifying the Swedish women and ridiculing the case. He did it over and over.”
I have been following the case and have not found any instances of this. What are his sources?

At 14:50 a woman says that the torn condom Gibney presents as evidence of Assange’s ‘trying to get women pregnant’ was found to have NO DNA on it. “How can you possibly justify not putting that fact in?” she asks.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/no-assange-dna-on-torn-condom–report-20120916-260vs.html

See how Gibney reacts physically (15:21), and then verbally. “There were a lot of facts that weren’t put in about the case…”

At 17:18 Gibney accuses Assange of “vilifying the Swedish women and ridiculing the case. He did it over and over.”
I have been following the case and have not found any instances of this. What are his sources?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LENm73uNsVw

At 14:50, Gibney is asked why he shows the condom allegedly broken by Assange, but does not refer to forensic evidence proving there was no DNA, male or female, on the condom.

Note how he responds.